Arqade is a question and answer site for passionate videogamers on all platforms. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

In Civilization 5: Gods & Kings, is it possible to give or receive false intrigue?

If another Civ tells me that some other Civ is plotting against me, should I always believe that this is the case? Or could the AI be telling porkies?

share|improve this question
Great question, I am intrigued. – George Duckett Feb 11 '13 at 15:36
I will use comment since I am unsure, but I believe it means that the other civ just doesn't care for you and would attack you if it had the chance. – Quinma Feb 11 '13 at 16:36
up vote 11 down vote accepted

Since intrigue is based on what the AI is likely to do, and the AI changes its mind often, it's hard to say if you could be given false intrigue. The false positive rate is nearly impossible to quantify, and from the player's perspective "false intrigue" and "intrigue that changes" are effectively the same.

For instance, let's say AI #1 tells you AI #2 is plotting a sneak attack against you. You build up a military in response, but AI #2 attacks AI #3 instead.

Was AI #1 lying, and the intrigue shared was invalid? Or was your military response sufficient to deflect the attack elsewhere? There's no real way to tell.

I think the practical answer is that you can be given intrigue that never quite pans out. If that's because the AI rethinks, or because the intrigue was a lie is not really possible to determine.

I have never been in a case where I (as the player) could give false intrigue to other civs. I'm inclined to believe that they play by the same rules - all intrigue given to you is true, but subject to change.

share|improve this answer
From my modding experience with Civ4 I can say that the AI does quantify its invasion plans a la backstab or sneak attack and often changes them as the military situation develops. Given that, I would be that shared intrigue is always 100% accurate at that time. An invasion diverted due to your sudden military build-up did exist when it was discovered and shared. So when you are given this information, it pays to take steps to address it. – David Harkness Dec 14 '13 at 21:38

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.