Take the 2-minute tour ×
Arqade is a question and answer site for passionate videogamers on all platforms. It's 100% free, no registration required.

This stems from the comments on this question. Imagine two cities, A and B, close enough that one can work the tiles that were acquired by the other (either through purchasing them or through cultural expansion). If a tile was acquired by A, and I manually select the tile to be worked by B, does the tile transfer "ownership" to B? So that if B were captured, the tile would go with it, or if A were captured, the tile would stay with B?

share|improve this question
    
Oh geez my head. It's a good question but ouch. –  Daniel Lew Nov 11 '10 at 16:34

1 Answer 1

up vote 9 down vote accepted

Working a tile does not seem to change the ownership of that tile. If the city is conquered, only the tiles the city directly acquired (culture or bought) are transferred to the conqueror.

Placing a city into an area already owned by the player will transfer ownership of the city tile and the initial inner ring of tiles to that new city.

share|improve this answer
1  
Unless of course part of that inner ring of tiles already belongs to a different player, in which case it won't transfer, correct? –  bwarner Nov 11 '10 at 17:54
    
I did not test that explicitly, but I assume (and I think I remember it from previous games) tiles from other civs won't switch if you build a city near them. –  Mad Scientist Nov 12 '10 at 7:08
    
that is right, you can't steal tiles from other civs by settling cities –  Adj Nov 12 '10 at 11:30

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.