Arqade is a question and answer site for passionate videogamers on all platforms. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

It is often useful to stack pistons to shift blocks by more than one space. As an extended piston can not be moved, the timing of the corresponding redstone circuit is of crucial importance. Additionally, for the construction of larger gates, you have to line up several of these double extenders.

What is the most compact design of down-shifting double-pistons in a row?

share|improve this question
The best way is to activate the first row with some repeaters to make it stay active longer and activate the second row. With right timing the second row will open and close before the first one closes. – N1xx1 Apr 5 '13 at 5:08
up vote 7 down vote accepted

There is none

There is a big stonking problem with the double-extender. It doesn't work vertically. At least not, if you want multiple of them after one another.

In order to line up the pistons, only one side may be used to power blocks adjacent to the pistons. So, let's look at what our redstone has to do when, and where it can do it.

For a down-pushing double-extender to work, we need to take a look at the following schematic:

State 0

In order to "close the gate", we need to extend the upper piston first, by powering the top block:

State 1

Then, we extend the lower piston, by powering the bottom block:

State 2

With this, the double-extender is fully extended. Now we need to pull it back in. For that, we first retract the lower piston by powering down the bottom block:

State 3

Now, retract the upper piston by powering down the top block:

State 4

Ooops! Now we have a floating block.

To fix that, we need to extend and retract the lower piston again, by powering the middle block:

State 5 State 6

Good, now we have the theory down.

In practice, this cannot be done on just one side (which is the requirement for having multiple of them in a line). It is impossible to power all three layers individually at these distinct times, because redstone takes up a vertical air block.

A condensed one-sided Double Extender only works horizontally (as taken from

Horizontal Double-Extender (layout courtesy

Vertical double-extenders only work with powering from multiple sides. For that purpose, I have also built an upside-down version of this vertical double-extender (again) from

working Vertical Double Extender (layout courtesy working Vertical Double Extender (layout courtesy

share|improve this answer
Thanks for the detailed and well-illustrated answer! Are there alternative approaches through the introduction of the new redstone blocks? – Jens Piegsa Apr 10 '13 at 13:33
@jeppi Any time. As far as I can tell, the new blocks can't help here either, as the core problem (a circuit needs two blocks of height, block and redstone wire) still persists. – user98085 Apr 10 '13 at 14:11

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.