Take the 2-minute tour ×
Arqade is a question and answer site for passionate videogamers on all platforms. It's 100% free, no registration required.

The puzzle, with two moves to solve, is:

enter image description here

My keyboard is:

enter image description here

The nature of the puzzle dictates I get to the second ( in a single move so that I can expend my last one moving up. (For those familiar with vim but not the game, my starting square is the yellow highlighted -.)

This level is mostly about the f/F, t/T, ; and , keys. The ability to recall f/F and t/T commands with ; and , persists in between attempts and puzzles.

Clearly I'm supposed to enter in some command, retry the puzzle, and back-peddle to the second ( with , but I can't find a command that takes me there. I thought t3 would do the trick but when I rerun it with , it places me on the first * for some reason.

I would also expect T3; ; to work but I meet with the same fate.

share|improve this question
1  
I have no idea what I'm looking at :O –  DrFish Jul 1 at 16:54
    
@DrFish This was my reaction to it –  Rapitor Jul 1 at 17:04
    
It's a game that teaches how to use vim, a sort of power-user text editor. –  Chris Keele Jul 1 at 20:13

3 Answers 3

f(, reset, ,, , ?

Seems to work in vim itself, though my keybinds stop me from trying ; :)

e: I forgot the 2-step limit, so this won't fly.

share|improve this answer
    
That's the closest I've gotten yet, but as noted above: The nature of the puzzle dictates I get to the second ( in a single move so that I can expend my last one moving up. Two ,s means no k to escape the puzzle. –  Chris Keele Jun 29 at 4:27
    
Can you do 2, ? –  Collin Grady Jun 29 at 4:41
    
As shown on the keyboard, I don't have access to numbers yet. :/ –  Chris Keele Jun 29 at 5:01
    
I'm beginning to think this must be a bug; t3 really ought to work. –  Chris Keele Jun 29 at 5:01
    
It doesn't work in vim though, so why would it work in the game? –  Collin Grady Jun 29 at 5:04
up vote 1 down vote accepted

It turns out % is smart enough to know what to do in this situation.

share|improve this answer

2F( would reach the second (.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.