Take the 2-minute tour ×
Arqade is a question and answer site for passionate videogamers on all platforms. It's 100% free, no registration required.

When using Stalker, I feel that I move faster aiming down sight than walking normally.

Is this true? Also, in objectively relative terms, what is the speed advantage from using Stalker?

share|improve this question
    
Just checking back - has your question been answered? –  Jarrod Mosen May 8 '13 at 0:03
add comment

2 Answers

With Stalker, you do move faster while aiming down your sights than aiming down your sights if you didn't have the perk. When you upgrade it to "Pro," it also delays triggers, such as claymores, (similar to Scrambler Pro, MW2).

However, you move slower when you are aiming down your sights, no matter what.

The best way to figure out the speed advantage would be to have two people, one with, one without Stalker, have a "running race," while aiming down their sights, and see how far one can get before the other, as there have been no official numbers released yet!

http://callofduty.wikia.com/wiki/Stalker_(Perk)

share|improve this answer
add comment

You move at the same speed as when you're not aiming down the sights.

The reason you perceive yourself to be moving faster is because of the increased level of zoom you're now viewing the world at.

share|improve this answer
    
That is true, except in this case, the Stalker perk (as he mentions he's using) increases the ADS speed, or, more accurately, decreases the penalty. –  Jarrod Mosen Nov 11 '11 at 4:22
    
@JarrodMosen Exactly. He's saying he thinks that he runs faster while aiming down the sites with the perk, than if he has the perk and doesn't aim down the sites, which isn't true. Your answer assumes that he's talking about two people both aiming down the sites, one person with the perk and one without. –  Mr Smooth Nov 11 '11 at 4:35
    
Oh sorry! Yes, I misread the question, sorry! Updated, and left it for future reference. Upvoting yours when I can. –  Jarrod Mosen Nov 11 '11 at 4:40
    
Is there some reason someone downvoted this? It's factually correct, and answers the question. –  Mr Smooth Nov 11 '11 at 5:04
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.