Take the 2-minute tour ×
Arqade is a question and answer site for passionate videogamers on all platforms. It's 100% free, no registration required.

After a match, I usually look in Battlelog match resume to observe my results, together with those of my teammates and opponents.

On question came to my mind: how is skill level calculated?

In fact, while you can see my battle stats with a K/D outcome of 14/13 and 12% accuracy report a skill level of 13.77, the top player from the winning team had a -10.71 skill level with a K/D of 25/14 and a greater accuracy than mine.

How come?

Stats for the match

enter image description here

share|improve this question
    
Related: gaming.stackexchange.com/questions/33502/… –  Hex Apr 5 '12 at 14:02

3 Answers 3

up vote 11 down vote accepted

From Dice:

This is what determines your skill level on your stats page:

  • You gain/loose SL based on every confrontation with another player

  • Killing a highly skilled enemy gives you more points than killing someone less skilled

  • Points are not transferred from a player to another, they are simply added/subtracted based on the encounter and the SL of both parts (thus, after an encounter, one part may go up 50 points while the other loses only 20)

  • The SL is used for matchmaking

Skill level fluctuates so much, I wouldn't worry about it.

share|improve this answer
    
I second that. Skill Level is of no importance. –  Doomsknight Apr 5 '12 at 17:17
1  
Third that. I've seen my skill level (total, not just round) fluctuate by hundreds just from two rounds played. The global skill level is therefore pretty useless in my opinion. –  AHungerArtist Apr 5 '12 at 17:55

The skill level is also based on in-game actions (Capturing/defending, Squad revives/assists etc) Which is why you will sometimes see the player with the most kills have a lower skill ranking.

share|improve this answer

Just to add a little bit of info to Foxtrot's answer, my biggest gain in one match was 199.04, my biggest loss -192.84. This graph shows the fluctuation as compared to K/D, SPM, and W/L. As you can see, there is really no correlation. In my opinion, SPM when taken with a decent K/D is a much better measure of skill.

enter image description here

Also, for example, here are some numbers from my clan:

K/D W/L SPM Skill

0.97 0.86 248 274

1.28 1.69 304 150

1.49 1.43 515 102

0.81 1.80 250 239

1.17 1.12 334 -165

share|improve this answer
1  
Nice example to add. –  AHungerArtist Apr 5 '12 at 20:33
    
I agree that you should take Skill Level with a certain 'pinch of salt', but I'm not sure KDR is what you should be looking at either. The problem with concentrating on KDR is that it encourages selfish play: Do I join in the attack/defence of the flag, or sit back at a safer distance? Good players will tend to have a combination of better statistics –  CJM Jun 27 '12 at 16:53
    
@CJM - I didn't say it did, and I have a very good combination (in terms of ranking, my KDR is my worst stat). I was merely comparing skill, SPM, KDR, and W/L to show there does not seem to be a correlation to any of them –  SSumner Jun 27 '12 at 16:54

protected by Community Jan 1 '13 at 19:39

Thank you for your interest in this question. Because it has attracted low-quality answers, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site.

Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.