Take the 2-minute tour ×
Arqade is a question and answer site for passionate videogamers on all platforms. It's 100% free, no registration required.

What I ask myself is what counts more in StarCraft II? Is it a well balanced strategy (e.g. I know my opponent will get a lot of zerglings only, so I build a Colossus to roast his units) or is it the speed - the perfect timing and hitting of the correct buttons and the use of a perfect hotkey system?

I mean is it important to click as fast and precisely as you would do in a FPS or is the strategy the more important aspect?

Couldn't figure it out, I had matches where I mad many "mistakes" but won with a good strategy, vice versa the same.

share|improve this question
    
tough question. I know precision isn't as important as APM, but in the Macro vs Micro question I don't think there is a winner: gamingse.wordpress.com/2010/08/26/macro-vs-micro –  tzenes Sep 7 '10 at 22:08

3 Answers 3

up vote 20 down vote accepted

I think the best way to imagine it is to imagine your total effectiveness as combination of the two attributes - you call them Speed and Brain. I think your total effectiveness is best modeled as Speed times Brain. Increasing either one is useful, but increasing only one is not as helpful as increasing both.

If you have a 10 for Brain but a 1 for Speed (IE you know exactly what your opponent is thinking, but you can barely use a mouse), your total score is 10. If you are as dumb as a pile of bricks (Brain 1) but have great mouse skills (Speed 10), you might also have a score of 10. but a guy with moderate brains and fingers might have a score of 5 times 5 or 25, which would beat both of the extremely lopsided guys.

Finally, note that if you watch a lot of vids and up your Brain score by 4 points to 9, you're a 9 times 5 or 45. If you instead watched some vids and practice some "Speed", you're now 7 times 7, or 49. In other words, try to balance out both strategy and execution.

share|improve this answer
2  
+1 for the formula. Improving either skillset improves your ability to take advantage of the other skillset. Each one multiplies the effectiveness of the other. –  LessPop_MoreFizz Sep 7 '10 at 23:05
1  
I kind of like this one. –  tzenes Sep 7 '10 at 23:40

The best answer you'll get is that both are very important. Higher APM opens up new strategic possibilities, as the ability to react and plan faster gives you new options. Similarly, the effectiveness of your strategy is inherently capped by your ability to execute it.

While certain playstyles may be more forgiving to a lower APM player, and certain strategies may require less reaction time at the expense of requiring better planning, at the end of the day, you're only as good a player as both skillsets combined.

share|improve this answer
    
My average APM is between 24 and 60 and I still can beat most of my opponents, altough they have a much higher APM. –  daemonfire300 Sep 7 '10 at 22:10
    
Like I said, it's not the only factor, and if your strategic thinking is strong, than it can 'cover' weakness in the more 'twitch' aspects of gameplay. You will only become a better player if you improve either skillset. This isn't Rock Paper Scissors where one trumps the other. Each competency informs your ability to make better use of the other. –  LessPop_MoreFizz Sep 7 '10 at 22:14
2  
when you talk about APM it helps to distinguish between "effective APM" and the APM that a replay shows up in the top left corner. You might just have a lot less random clicks or useless button pushes than your opponents. –  Peter Recore Sep 7 '10 at 22:37
4  
@camino I know a lot of people like to say: "50 good clicks is better than 200 useless." Once the ladder starts matching you against top 10 Diamond you quickly learn what 200 useful clicks feels like. Its the ability to manage harassment, a base + several expo, and micro a large battle all at the same time. Its very very scary, and there really is no strategy that, alone, will beat it. –  tzenes Sep 7 '10 at 23:42

I'm going to possibly be a little controversial and say that long term I would say that speed is going to be the limiting factor and more a measure of potential.

There are physical limits to have fast you can act (which is actually limited by how fast you can think, rather than how fast you can physically press buttons because if you're just mashing buttons you could easily get 300+ APM but it's meaningless)

Have a good strategy is equally important to have, but it's easier to learn, especially with replays, videos and sites like this. Just because you didn't make up the strategy doesn't mean that you can't copy it and do it better than the person that did invent it.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.