Skip to main content
added 130 characters in body
Source Link
Gigazelle
  • 14.2k
  • 11
  • 65
  • 114

ThisIf low latency is the most efficient vertical layoutmore important than space, you can go straight up in a mostly 1x2 space, with the least amounta small section of latency possible2x3:

Ignore the house

Most of theIf space is only 1x2more important than low latency, you can replace the repeater with a small section ofvertical double NOT gate, which would lower the maximum space from 2x3 to accommodate the repeater. I anticipate this would work with your 128 block pillar.1x3:

enter image description here

This is the most efficient vertical layout with the least amount of latency possible:

Ignore the house

Most of the space is only 1x2, with a small section of 2x3 to accommodate the repeater. I anticipate this would work with your 128 block pillar.

If low latency is more important than space, you can go straight up in a mostly 1x2 space, with a small section of 2x3:

Ignore the house

If space is more important than low latency, you can replace the repeater with a vertical double NOT gate, which would lower the maximum space from 2x3 to 1x3:

enter image description here

Source Link
Gigazelle
  • 14.2k
  • 11
  • 65
  • 114

This is the most efficient vertical layout with the least amount of latency possible:

Ignore the house

Most of the space is only 1x2, with a small section of 2x3 to accommodate the repeater. I anticipate this would work with your 128 block pillar.