Timeline for Are there any games/tactics where infestor controlled units are used to build "foreign" units?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
14 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 22 at 14:07 | answer | added | Josh Kidd | timeline score: 1 | |
| S Jan 12, 2023 at 16:29 | history | suggested | user985366 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
"drone" should be "probe"
|
| Jan 12, 2023 at 8:07 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Jan 12, 2023 at 16:29 | |||||
| Jul 26, 2012 at 9:39 | comment | added | tenfour | Here's another way to get the Zerglot achievement: Play a ladder 2v2 game where you play Zerg, and your teammate is Protoss. Your teammate leaves, you warp in a zealot with his warp gate. This is actually the easiest way to earn this achievement. | |
| Mar 30, 2012 at 14:58 | answer | added | bummzack | timeline score: 4 | |
| Mar 25, 2011 at 18:58 | answer | added | Nienna | timeline score: 0 | |
| Mar 11, 2011 at 9:03 | vote | accept | bummzack | ||
| Mar 10, 2011 at 18:57 | comment | added | Sorean | I just wanted to mention this because I didn't see it brought up. If you NP a terran SCV, when it wears off, the SCV will stop building the building and you will need to NP it again and tell the SCV to continue building. Which is probably why the achievement is to capture a probe instead because once you start warping, the probe can die off and you'll still have a nexus. I also can't remember if you end up sharing supply with the new protoss units or if they count are a new set (like in SC1). | |
| Mar 10, 2011 at 15:50 | comment | added | bummzack | @Grace Note: Done. Expanded a bit on the question. Playing vs. Protoss is probably the most realistic case. | |
| Mar 10, 2011 at 15:49 | history | edited | bummzack | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
added 352 characters in body
|
| Mar 10, 2011 at 15:04 | comment | added | Grace Note♦ | Would you be interested in opening up this question from just "previous executions of this tactic" to asking if it is an effective tactic, and if it has been successfully (or unsuccessfully) used in the past? The question is fine as is, but I think the expansion may eke out some more detailed answers. | |
| Mar 10, 2011 at 14:34 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/StackGaming/status/45854992061575168 | ||
| Mar 10, 2011 at 13:46 | answer | added | tenfour | timeline score: 10 | |
| Mar 10, 2011 at 13:08 | history | asked | bummzack | CC BY-SA 2.5 |