Skip to main content
34 events
when toggle format what by license comment
S Jan 29, 2021 at 2:15 history bounty ended Robotnik
S Jan 29, 2021 at 2:15 history notice removed Robotnik
Jan 21, 2021 at 22:52 answer added Diriector_Doc timeline score: 0
S Jan 21, 2021 at 22:41 history bounty started Robotnik
S Jan 21, 2021 at 22:41 history notice added Robotnik Reward existing answer
Jan 19, 2021 at 0:30 history edited Robotnik CC BY-SA 4.0
added 250 characters in body; edited title
Oct 20, 2020 at 12:54 answer added aphid timeline score: 10
Oct 24, 2011 at 7:26 history edited DMA57361 CC BY-SA 3.0
reuploading broken image (broken i.igmur → i.stack.igmur convesion)
Oct 23, 2011 at 21:38 answer added Finn G timeline score: 5
Mar 22, 2011 at 21:26 comment added Cyclops @Kevin Y, thanks, it was tricky to develop. We'll see what the OP thinks. :)
Mar 22, 2011 at 19:56 comment added Kevin Yap @Cyclops My solution is a big non-functioning mess at the moment. Clocks are very finicky. Your solution, however, is great (better than anything I could come up with, lol).
Mar 22, 2011 at 15:24 comment added Cyclops @Kevin Y, you seemed very enthusiastic about this question - so where's your solution? It's been over a week. :)
Mar 20, 2011 at 1:55 answer added Cyclops timeline score: 4
Mar 17, 2011 at 21:31 answer added MoonBun timeline score: 13
Mar 15, 2011 at 22:24 answer added zzzzBov timeline score: 1
Mar 15, 2011 at 21:06 comment added RedstoneDwarf @zzzzBov Incredible summary! That just about explains it perfectly. Now design it for me? lol..
Mar 15, 2011 at 17:14 comment added zzzzBov Let me see if i understand this correctly: Inputs: buttons 1-5, randomize Output: valid, invalid. When the circuit is randomized, one of the buttons is piped to the valid channel, the other 4 are piped to the invalid channel. Is this correct?
Mar 12, 2011 at 23:32 comment added RedstoneDwarf @Cyclops In this example the end outputs are the same, one is just linked randomly to a single button whilst the other is linked to the remaining 4. In the above example its fairly useless, however I will be connecting it to a much larger circuit. The incorrect signal(right) will reset the larger circuit. The correct one will allow you to continue, this could be to enable the next circuit/open a door/etc. The "aim" is to have 5 buttons and not be able to know which one is correct, essentially making it chance if you are correct or not. But it must be in this format for my plans.
Mar 12, 2011 at 22:09 comment added Cyclops If both final outputs produce a true (positive) signal, what makes them different? I'm a little confused on the desired output sequence. I note that in your diagram, if you only press one button (say the left) you only get one signal. What is the ultimate goal of the two signals? Toggling the flip-flop?
Mar 12, 2011 at 18:20 comment added RedstoneDwarf @Kevin Y I thought so and that's fine. A reliable redstone based circuit is preferable over a mechanical method as mentioned by Stuart. Even though its quite an imaginative solution. Feel free to PM me via minecraftforums(username is "ops"), I have a private server full of complicated redstone :).
Mar 12, 2011 at 17:57 comment added Kevin Yap @redstonedwarf Unfortunately, a clock would be the only way to produce a (pseudo-)random result. I'm working on a design right now.
Mar 12, 2011 at 16:43 comment added Stu Pegg I'm thinking of a pig/cow herd fenced into an area with pressure plates, but I can't get any further than that without getting distracted by all the other possible uses for such (music generator, trap gauntlet automation...).
Mar 12, 2011 at 12:02 history edited RedstoneDwarf CC BY-SA 2.5
added 73 characters in body
Mar 12, 2011 at 11:58 comment added RedstoneDwarf @Vlad The physical position and type must stay the same for everything outside the grey box. You can expand the box to allow room for the circuit though. For the random part: I want wire going to the left button to change which button it goes to. Obviously this isn't physically possible, so I need a circuit to randomise which button is associated with a "correct" signal whilst all other can still produce an "incorrect" signal. Oh and the 6th input on the right is only for triggering the randomisation.
Mar 12, 2011 at 11:52 comment added RedstoneDwarf @Kevin Y Yes. But I still require the "incorrect" buttons to produce a signal at the end also.
Mar 12, 2011 at 11:50 comment added RedstoneDwarf @Raven Dreamer So far I can't think of any limits as far as method used. However if it is at all possible to do it without a clock then its preferable, so as to reduce server load/lag.
Mar 12, 2011 at 10:55 comment added MoonBun can you explain what is your inputs and outputs? I've only got that you have 6 inputs, and you want to "change" or "randomize" the buttons. Not sure what do you mean by change the button.
Mar 12, 2011 at 4:54 comment added Kevin Yap Also, is there any size or amount of redstone constants? (please say no, please say no)
Mar 12, 2011 at 4:49 comment added Raven Dreamer I'm guessing you want some sort of clock for the randomization part, hm?
Mar 12, 2011 at 4:48 comment added Kevin Yap Yay, a redstone challenge! So basically, you want something in the middle of the diagram that will make it so the correct button is always random?
S Mar 12, 2011 at 2:38 history suggested Private Pansy CC BY-SA 2.5
Retag, and added image
Mar 12, 2011 at 2:34 history tweeted twitter.com/#!/StackGaming/status/46398633075159040
Mar 12, 2011 at 1:15 review Suggested edits
S Mar 12, 2011 at 2:38
Mar 12, 2011 at 1:09 history asked RedstoneDwarf CC BY-SA 2.5