Timeline for What contributes to the settlement size limit?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
16 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 10, 2017 at 16:12 | comment | added | Nelson | An addendum to the bug. You don't need to scrap the weapons, and a large stack of weapons will give you more. Drop the weapons and use the settlement menu to stash them. | |
| Jun 7, 2016 at 0:23 | comment | added | Brian | Do you have any insight as to how the settlements are rendered? All in memory or only in fov? If I build a wall that blocks the viewing of high poly areas would it increase FPS? | |
| S Nov 21, 2015 at 23:01 | history | suggested | CommunityBot | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Added Get Maximum values, clarified target.
|
| Nov 21, 2015 at 22:57 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Nov 21, 2015 at 23:01 | |||||
| Nov 20, 2015 at 19:58 | comment | added | aslum | There is also a bug/exploit ... if you need just a few more pieces, and aren't worried about performance, you can drop weapons, and then scrap them to lower the size limit. | |
| Nov 19, 2015 at 14:55 | comment | added | John | Destroying scrap to free up the budget is a great, non-obvious suggestion | |
| Nov 18, 2015 at 20:53 | comment | added | psouza4 | I have a feeling the reason is far more technical... some areas are isolated or further away from locations with high poly counts, like Sanctuary Hills, so the performance penalty for building even more polys is minimal. Other locations like Hangman's Alley are so close to other established areas that without higher restrictions, you could cause performance issues on lower-end machines. This is pure speculation, but likely the best consideration we have on the varied restrictions. | |
| Nov 18, 2015 at 18:33 | comment | added | king14nyr | Thanks for the update @psouza4. That's interesting... It makes me wonder if some settlements are more efficient in the square footage to max build limit ratio than others if, say, someone was looking to do one super settlement with a huge structure. Maybe a question for the future. :) | |
| Nov 18, 2015 at 17:42 | history | edited | kalina | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 32 characters in body
|
| S Nov 18, 2015 at 17:28 | history | edited | user114997 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
fixed a typo "getav 34B" should have been "getav 34A"
|
| S Nov 18, 2015 at 17:28 | history | suggested | psouza4 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
fixed a typo "getav 34B" should have been "getav 34A"
|
| Nov 18, 2015 at 17:21 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Nov 18, 2015 at 17:28 | |||||
| Nov 18, 2015 at 17:18 | comment | added | psouza4 | They definitely each have different limits. | |
| Nov 18, 2015 at 15:12 | vote | accept | king14nyr | ||
| Nov 18, 2015 at 15:00 | comment | added | king14nyr | Holy cow, that was quick for such a detailed answer. Thanks! Quick follow-up question... Do all settlements start with the same triangle limit, or is it proportional to the settlement size? eg) Does Sanctuary have a higher default maximum triangle limit than Red Rocket since the area is much larger? | |
| Nov 18, 2015 at 14:54 | history | answered | kalina | CC BY-SA 3.0 |