Timeline for How come no one researches Hi-Sec Auto Tracking?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
13 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 14, 2011 at 1:12 | vote | accept | Rohan Monga | ||
| Sep 12, 2011 at 13:46 | answer | added | seansand | timeline score: 1 | |
| Sep 12, 2011 at 7:45 | answer | added | Shaun | timeline score: 11 | |
| Sep 12, 2011 at 7:31 | comment | added | Ragnar | @Oak - Well, that's why I didn't mark it as invalid. Thanks for clearing it up. :-) | |
| Sep 12, 2011 at 7:12 | comment | added | Rohan Monga | someone go wake up tzenes | |
| Sep 12, 2011 at 6:36 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/StackGaming/status/113138802058477568 | ||
| Sep 12, 2011 at 6:21 | comment | added | Rohan Monga | @Wikwocket, so the more expensive the turret, the more important it is to have the upgrade that keeps it alive/ increase usefulness. | |
| Sep 12, 2011 at 5:13 | comment | added | Oak | @Ragnar high-level SC2 play revolves around heavily optimizing every little detail. If something has apparent advantage but still isn't used, I think it's a valid question why. | |
| Sep 12, 2011 at 5:11 | comment | added | Wikwocket | I believe this is a valid strategy question. FYI though, missle turrets cost 100 minerals, not 75. You could argue they effectively cost even more, due to the 25 seconds an SCV spends building each, instead of harvesting minerals. | |
| Sep 12, 2011 at 5:04 | comment | added | Rohan Monga | i am curious about the strategy or the motivation for this, I don't think it is a preference or opinion based thing. | |
| Sep 12, 2011 at 4:18 | comment | added | Ragnar | I don't play StarCraft 2, so I don't know the mechanics of the game, but this question (at least the title) seems to be subjective... | |
| Sep 12, 2011 at 4:12 | history | edited | Rohan Monga | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
edited title
|
| Sep 12, 2011 at 2:14 | history | asked | Rohan Monga | CC BY-SA 3.0 |