Skip to main content
edited tags
Link
user27134
user27134
Question Protected by juan
Tweeted twitter.com/#!/StackGaming/status/140162901062324224
added 147 characters in body
Source Link
Goblinlord
  • 1.4k
  • 3
  • 11
  • 18

What is both the most efficient way to reach the cap of 85% physical damage reduction (567 Armor)?

Can it be reached without smithing/enchanting perks? Is it more efficient to not get some smithing or enchanting perks and just get heavy armor perks? Or is there some combination of crafting and heavy armor perks that gets to 567 armor with a smaller investment of perk points?

For purposes of this question, most efficient is defined as the smallest possible amount of perks used to acquire the stated physical damage reduction, passively - i.e. without popping pots (temporary) or using extra buffs from stones, blessings, or +Heavy Armor skill enchants (to keep those slots on equipment free for other enhancements). Also, any skill used to achieve this can be assumed to be leveled to 100 (for example Heavy Armor could be assumed to be already leveled to 100).

What is both the most efficient way to reach the cap of 85% physical damage reduction (567 Armor)?

Can it be reached without smithing/enchanting perks? Is it more efficient to not get some smithing or enchanting perks and just get heavy armor perks? Or is there some combination of crafting and heavy armor perks that gets to 567 armor with a smaller investment of perk points?

For purposes of this question, most efficient is defined as the smallest possible amount of perks used to acquire the stated physical damage reduction, passively - i.e. without popping pots (temporary) or using extra buffs from stones, blessings, or +Heavy Armor skill enchants (to keep those slots on equipment free for other enhancements).

What is both the most efficient way to reach the cap of 85% physical damage reduction (567 Armor)?

Can it be reached without smithing/enchanting perks? Is it more efficient to not get some smithing or enchanting perks and just get heavy armor perks? Or is there some combination of crafting and heavy armor perks that gets to 567 armor with a smaller investment of perk points?

For purposes of this question, most efficient is defined as the smallest possible amount of perks used to acquire the stated physical damage reduction, passively - i.e. without popping pots (temporary) or using extra buffs from stones, blessings, or +Heavy Armor skill enchants (to keep those slots on equipment free for other enhancements). Also, any skill used to achieve this can be assumed to be leveled to 100 (for example Heavy Armor could be assumed to be already leveled to 100).

Cleaned up the question for clarity.
Source Link
LessPop_MoreFizz
  • 76.5k
  • 92
  • 367
  • 516

Since the cap is more of a "soft" cap than a hard cap (from what I read it seems anyways)... whatWhat is both the most efficient way to reach 80% physical damage reduction as well asthe cap of 85% physical damage reduction (567 Armor)? Can you reach either

Can it be reached without smithing/enchanting perks? IsIs it more efficient to not get some smithing or enchanting perks and just get heavy armor perks? Can you do it with aOr is there some combination of less smithing/alchemy/enchanting/heavycrafting and heavy armor perks than it canthat gets to 567 armor with other combinationa smaller investment of perk points? Most

For purposes of this question, most efficient being... leastis defined as the smallest possible amount of perks used to acquire the stated physical damage reduction and with it being passive, passively - i.e. without popping pots (temporary) or using extra buffs from sign/blessings. Edit: Alsostones, no using heavy armorblessings, or +Heavy Armor skill enchants as they would be used(to keep those slots on equipment free for other thingsenhancements).

Since the cap is more of a "soft" cap than a hard cap (from what I read it seems anyways)... what is both the most efficient way to reach 80% physical damage reduction as well as 85% physical damage reduction? Can you reach either without smithing/enchanting perks? Is it more efficient to not get some smithing or enchanting perks and just get heavy armor perks? Can you do it with a combination of less smithing/alchemy/enchanting/heavy armor perks than it can with other combination? Most efficient being... least amount of perks used to acquire the stated physical damage reduction and with it being passive without popping pots (temporary) or using extra buffs from sign/blessings. Edit: Also, no using heavy armor skill enchants as they would be used for other things.

What is both the most efficient way to reach the cap of 85% physical damage reduction (567 Armor)?

Can it be reached without smithing/enchanting perks? Is it more efficient to not get some smithing or enchanting perks and just get heavy armor perks? Or is there some combination of crafting and heavy armor perks that gets to 567 armor with a smaller investment of perk points?

For purposes of this question, most efficient is defined as the smallest possible amount of perks used to acquire the stated physical damage reduction, passively - i.e. without popping pots (temporary) or using extra buffs from stones, blessings, or +Heavy Armor skill enchants (to keep those slots on equipment free for other enhancements).

edited title
Source Link
Goblinlord
  • 1.4k
  • 3
  • 11
  • 18
Loading
Source Link
Goblinlord
  • 1.4k
  • 3
  • 11
  • 18
Loading