Timeline for How does discovering new patterns/recipes/schematics with reverse engineering work?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 9, 2012 at 22:23 | comment | added | Rodolfo | nah, that's wrong. 5% would be 1 in 20 chance, no way, it's much more frequent than that. From my experience and those in my guild, it's like 1 in 10 chance. | |
| Jan 9, 2012 at 21:45 | comment | added | LessPop_MoreFizz | @Rodolfo: The number I've seen speculated at is closer to 5%, but nobody has had the resources to do truly comprehensive testing on the subject just yet. | |
| Jan 9, 2012 at 15:34 | comment | added | Rodolfo | it's the devil that randomness is. I've had 2 streaks of over 20 failed attempts in a row, and between them, I successfully RE twice in a row. In average, I would say the chance is around 10% of a successful RE | |
| Jan 9, 2012 at 14:23 | comment | added | Kaz Dragon | As I understand it, "Mastercraft" is a critical success when crafting an artifact (which would otherwise be "advanced"). This is evidenced by having only three schematics on the linked page, with four results. | |
| Jan 8, 2012 at 0:18 | comment | added | Sorean | At this moment I wouldn't be able to tell you. | |
| Jan 7, 2012 at 22:21 | comment | added | Nick T | Is the "Mastercraft" modification a legendary version? | |
| Jan 7, 2012 at 17:27 | history | answered | Sorean | CC BY-SA 3.0 |