Timeline for Who should I give titles to?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 3, 2012 at 23:56 | history | edited | kotekzot | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
grammar
|
| Feb 25, 2012 at 15:25 | comment | added | Alien-47 | Homos still can have children) You gain a very little penalty to fertility. But fertility also decreaces with age. | |
| Feb 24, 2012 at 14:44 | comment | added | Rodolfo | yes, I thought so too, until my last king had only 2 daughters and they died before they could have any kids, so I had to change hereditary rules to elect my brother, or it would have been 'game over'. Funny thing is, when my king was 54 or so, I was still hoping he could have kids if the queen died, but then he got an event that said he felt 'weird sensations' in the last tournament... he turned homosexual :) | |
| Feb 24, 2012 at 9:04 | comment | added | Alien-47 | I treat these relatives like everyone else - sometime give them land, sometime not. It greatly depends on theis personal traits and relations. Your dynasty isn't the most important. The one thing that matters - your personal line of heritage. Take care of the main heir, don't give any real power to it's closest competitors for his title. | |
| Feb 22, 2012 at 15:01 | comment | added | Rodolfo | thanks, good tips. I still have some doubts about this. Should I give titles to my family members like uncles, brothers and half-brothers? For example, in my current game I have an uncle that loved me, so I gave him a county with its contents. Everything was fine, but guess after a while he stopped loving me, eventually he was plotting to murder me (or was it my heiress?) so had to imprison him. But then if I only give things to non-family, doesn't my dynasty suffer? | |
| Feb 22, 2012 at 14:59 | vote | accept | Rodolfo | ||
| Feb 22, 2012 at 6:39 | history | answered | Alien-47 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |