Timeline for How fat is 'Steve'?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
14 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 20, 2014 at 5:03 | vote | accept | Dani | ||
| Aug 20, 2012 at 23:41 | history | edited | Amy B | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 270 characters in body
|
| Aug 20, 2012 at 20:07 | history | edited | Amy B | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 391 characters in body; added 17 characters in body
|
| Aug 20, 2012 at 19:54 | history | edited | Amy B | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 466 characters in body; added 4 characters in body
|
| Aug 14, 2012 at 16:09 | comment | added | Dani | @Random832 I've tried this, with the F3 coordinates, but I wasn't able to get an accurate measure. I also tried comparing the crosshair movement, but this is dependent on the distance from the block in front of you, so it was even more inaccurate. If you are able to take a measurement using this or another technique, please post as an answer with your proof. | |
| Aug 14, 2012 at 0:22 | review | Low quality posts | |||
| Aug 15, 2012 at 7:52 | |||||
| Aug 13, 2012 at 20:02 | comment | added | Random832 | You can't stand facing directly forward and move from side to side, checking your position at each extreme? | |
| Aug 13, 2012 at 2:09 | comment | added | Dani | @TrewTzu Yes, but he edited his answer completely from the original text, which is why my comment does not make any sense, but I think it should remain anyways, since you can view the original answer by clicking on the edited date. Also, I've tried this and there is no accurate way of measuring "wiggle room". | |
| Aug 10, 2012 at 5:44 | comment | added | TrewTzu | I think @AmyB was saying that if you put him in the whole you can tell his less then 1 by 1 as there is still Wiggle Room. E.G Steve is as big as 1 by 1 minus how much he can wiggle around. | |
| Aug 10, 2012 at 0:52 | history | undeleted | Amy B | ||
| Aug 10, 2012 at 0:52 | history | edited | Amy B | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 180 characters in body; deleted 1 characters in body
|
| Aug 10, 2012 at 0:28 | history | deleted | Amy B | ||
| Aug 9, 2012 at 23:07 | comment | added | Dani | Not so. There is plenty of wiggle room. You should have done some research before posting. Also, doors plainly and clearly have thickness as is provable by running into the side of an open door with no walls; or by standing in the door's 1x1 block space with blocks all around and counting the pixels of the floor, or comparing wiggle room in both directions of the floor's plane. | |
| Aug 9, 2012 at 18:06 | history | answered | Amy B | CC BY-SA 3.0 |