Once watching own replay I figured own very obvious and very crusial thing.

In this replay I had around 35-40 harvesters on main+natural and income around 900-1000 minerals (per minute?) When I detected lack of harvesters I called 4 (or 5) MULEs. After that (if we believe to replay statistic) my income was JUMPED TILL 1800-1900 per minutes. It was kept on this level for 1.5 minutes...

It's obvious but it's so huge deal. That means that in 1.5 minute I get (almost for free) 1k5 minerals (30 marines!!!)

Plus add this topic StarCraft2: MULE - can he work on one mineral patch with another SCV in parallel?

Here I can conclude that often when: - you plan to expand but due to some reason can't move your CC to natural; - OR you plan to have 2nd expand but need to clean-up enemy forces from new location; - OR don't plan to expand but temporary have exceed of minerals

it could be a good idea to create a new CC on you main build a OC just to call for MULEs. Also, id you DO have expand or 2nd expand... It seems like very useful to build ONE MORE CC+OC just for CALL mules...

Usually Terran plays main+natural, and having 4 CC doesn't seem to bad for me. 4 CC means that 1 will be used for scanning and 3 more will be able to provide MULEs for 2 bases...

I understand the drawback of such strategy: instead of building production building and army you will increase economy strength and it is necessary to balance... But having enough minerals temporary you could put them in a CC+OC - and will pay for himself very quickly.

Am I right? Is there something that I missed here?

Edit: Forget to mention - CC is an additional supply, so it's actual cost is not 400, but 290 only! Though OC costs additional 150 minerals

3 Answers 3


You are right. This thinking resulted in the fresh Griffith's 4OC Push against Zerg.

This exploits the following characteristics of the Terran race:

  • Terran has the most cost-efficient defence mechanisms of any race, which allows turtling.

  • Command center can lift-off - allowing safe construction without investing into defending an expo.

  • OC essentially pays back for itself after 2-3 MULE calldowns. Extra calldowns are "free-money".

Without going into too specific BOs or details, the goal of building OCs in this way is to:

  • Start from a basic BO to counter early pushes and then go for a transition.

  • Make you less dependent on supply depots, as CCs give you +11 supply.

  • Gain an economical advantage without the need of going for multiple expos.

  • Throw down a PF (OC if you can't) at an expo when your minerals are depleted or you need gas.

It does pay itself back fairly quick, but there is a timing window in which you are more vulnerable...

Scouting will help you determine if you can afford the OC or should do something else instead.

Furthermore, this thinking is slowly gaining attention amongst top players:

This was amazing. Boxer showed us some very quirky play, building twelve orbital commands throughout the game, outpacing Hyperdub in every way. Boxer had superior tank play, superior drops, and superior strategy.

Check this amazing game here.

This lead to the discovery of other late game advantages:

  • Dropping MULEs in the enemy army to cause him to friendly fire with Tanks/Colossus.

  • Instantly repairing Mechanical units on the field with MULEs.

  • Throwing multiple scans to quickly gain an omniscience advantage.


It sounds like you are talking about something like this: post and post.

I've seen people use it successfully, but the problem you run into is that you have to burn a good number of minerals to start it up. 400 minerals doesn't sound like a lot, but its 8 marines or 4 marauders, which is a lot to be down.

In the higher ranks, the early/mid game pushes can be brutal. If you expand at your natural, you can start recouping your investment early, specially if you transfer half your svcs from your main right before it finishes. Remember, SVC mining rate doesn't increase linearly. 2 SVCS on two patches are better than 2 on one patch. 3 SVCs are better on two patches than one. With CC, you need to build your OC and THEN start dropping MUELS.

On a side note, i would say it makes sense to build your first expand inside your base and if you can't float it to your expand due to enemy pressure start teching it up right away.

  • 4
    "2 SVCS on two patches are better than 2 on one patch" is not true, the SCV mining rate is linear till you have 2 SCVs per patch. It's the third SCV on a patch that will face diminshing returns and a fourth SCV on a patch that will result in no additional income. MULEs are excluded from this rule: They can mine over other SCV's already mining that patch, but not other MULEs. Dec 29, 2010 at 16:12
  • 1
    Fixed, learn something new every day. :) Dec 29, 2010 at 17:06
  • Actually, I have to correct my last 3 words. According to Liquipedia II: MULEs can mine over other SCVs/MULEs thus providing extra income on expansions that are already saturated. Jan 3, 2011 at 20:30

I had thought this terrible strategy was dead. I guess I was mistaken.

Ideas, such as: Mass OC, are largely the product of Theory Craft and generally fall apart during actual implementation. It's very easy to look at MULE harvesting rate and see the potential for abuse without looking at the opportunity cost or the RoI.

Let us assume we are sound business people and let's look at the Return on Investment for a single OC:

Buildtime CC: 100 secs 400 Minerals
Buildtime Orbital: 35 secs 150 Minerals
Lost SCV Mining time: 100*0.75=75 Minerals
Savings due to not building supply depots: 41.25 seconds+137.5 Minerals
Gained mining time due to not building supply depots: 41.25*0.75=31 Minerals

Total cost until you can use the OC: 93.5 seconds, 456 Minerals

Time until you start turning a profit:
    On blue patches: Mules gather at a rate of 3 per second, so it takes a total of 245 seconds until you make a profit with extra OC builds.
    If you have access to rich patches it gets better: Mules gather at 4.2 per second, so it takes only a total of 202 seconds until you turn a profit.

Let us compare that to the humble SCV:

If you have less than 2 SCVs per patch, investment in a SCV pays for itself after:

Building time: 17 seconds, 50 minerals
Cost for supply: 12.5 minerals, 3.75 seconds
Mining time needed to gather 62.5 minerals: 83 seconds

So a SCV at less than 2/patch saturation takes 103.75 seconds to pay for itself. 

Citation: Teamliquid.net

When we look at the opportunity cost of the 4 minutes it takes for a MULE to pay for itself it almost immediately becomes apparent that it is not a worthwhile investment on its own.

This does not mean that MULEs are ineffective, or should not be used, however; if you consider the investment of the Command Center as part of the investment in a new expansion you are going to build and mine with SCVs then that cost is ammatorized across the SCVs and producing MULEs becomes cost effective. Since the upfront investment on a new Expansion is required regardless SCVs aren't a cost effective alternative. Once you have build the new Command Center at the Expansion SCVs once again become more cost effective than MULEs. This ultimately leads to: 1 Command Center per Expansion.

When coming across strange theory crafting like this, try to remember this guiding principle: If this is so game breaking, why isn't everyone doing it? The answer is almost never "they don't know yet."

  • Your citation falls apart when you create SCVs with your extra OC(s). Jan 3, 2011 at 17:00
  • @Tom You'll notice I mention that down at the bottom. In fact, that is the reason people build MULEs at all and that 1 Command Center Per Expansion is the current trend in pro-Terran players.
    – tzenes
    Jan 3, 2011 at 17:02
  • @tzenes: It's indeed not game breaking, but if your opponent gives you the chance to do so then you are in an economy advantage. The time until you start turning a profit is actually a lot lower because you can produce SCVs at a much higher rate... You also spare 100 Minerals as a CC gives you 11 supply over the 9 supply a SD gives you. OCs haven't been thought about well until a recent thread came up with combined multiple characteristics, that's why not everyone is doing it. Jan 3, 2011 at 17:10
  • @Tom you'll notice extra supply is already factored into the calculation. To show why building extra command center to build SCVs is a bad idea we only need to modify the MULE numbers to represent the SCVs. The pay off is even further away. If we look at combined numbers we run into the problem that you can't build SCVs while building the Orbital Command. As a result the additional costs of the SCVs don't pay for themselves until past the 238.5 second mark, meaning they produce an extra 4.5 minerals... Its not offsetting.
    – tzenes
    Jan 3, 2011 at 17:17
  • @tzenes: Your comment doesn't make much sense. They pay themselves back till the mark, afterwards it's pure profit! It's not like it takes more effort to create an OC than an expo... ;-) Jan 3, 2011 at 17:33

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .