So I haven't been playing hearthstone for that long, but I've played a lot of other card games before. One thing I'm confused about is the prevalence of high-level decks that run 1 copy of a (non-legendary) card. In many other card games, you generally want to run the maximum number of copies of each card, because otherwise you're introducing too much uncertainty into your deck.

Can someone explain to me the prevalence of using 1 card instead of 2, and what situations you would do this in? I like to build all of my own decks, and this seems to be an important concept.

2 Answers 2


I feel like your question is starting from an invalid premise. Hearthstone is no different from other card games when it comes to how many copies of a card you want in a deck (barring the obvious differences of how many cards you can have and how many copies are allowed).

In Magic: The Gathering, there are common strategies for putting anywhere from 1 to 4 copies of a card in your deck. I even looked at some recent Magic: The Gathering top decks and saw Akito Shinoda's deck which won the Grand Prix Shizuoka 2015 which ran a single copy of 17 different non-land cards. This is a top deck in a card game that allows four copies of a card.

In most card games, there are strategic reasons to use less than the maximum number of copies of each card.

So, onto Hearthstone! One thing to realize about many top Hearthstone decks is that they tend to run a variety of cards that draw cards. This means often when a player gets to the maximum mana (on their 10th turn), they have already drawn two thirds or more of their deck. This means that running multiple copies for reasons of consistency only matters for your first few turns. Here are a variety of reasons that you would only run 1 of a card in Hearthstone. You may note that these reasons are similar to the article on Magic: The Gathering.

  • The card is only good in certain situations. Drawing two of this card would be a bad thing in almost every game, but drawing one can really help sometimes and not hurt too badly other times. This applies to most combo cards (which need the other half of the combo to be good). An example would be Sabotage.
  • The split. Sometimes you do want two (or three) of two different, but similar, cards. Each of the two cards is better in a different situation, but both have a similar effect. You run both of the cards so that you have a good answer to either situation and sometimes the best answer. However, you don't want to run all four copies. An example would be Shadowflame and Hellfire.
  • The card has a really high cost. Drawing two 10 cost cards before turn 10 counts as two dead cards in your hand. Also, a 9 or 10 cost card is such a high cost that you are unlikely to play it immediately after drawing it because you couldn't do anything else that turn. It is usually best to have only one copy of a high cost card in your deck. An example would be Mind Control.
  • A countermeasures card. A card that is very reactionary to a particular play by your opponent only needs to have two copies if the particular play is very common. Otherwise, the possibility of drawing two of these and having them simply wait in your hand doesn't further your own strategy. An example would be Big Game Hunter.
  • A reach card. There are two types of reach cards. One, you would only play this card to increase your damage on a turn that you win. Two, you would only play this card in a long game in order to extend your deck past when it would normally fizzle out. Most examples of these reach cards are legendary cards. Despite that two copies are sometimes used, Savage Roar is an example.

In addition to all of these examples, sometimes it is just a matter of not having space for two cards. For example, if I used an odd number of legendary cards in my deck, I'd have to choose to include only one copy of some non-legendary card.

  • I've never been a top player in any card game other than Highgrounds (where you're allowed to run a 14-card deck), so please pardon my ignorance. Good summary, thanks for the answer. Really good article as well, definitely going to bookmark it.
    – Dustin
    Commented Feb 9, 2015 at 15:58
  • Totally forgot about BGH, nice example
    – Jubatus
    Commented Feb 9, 2015 at 16:08
  • I feel like many of the examples used here aren't great exmples, since a decent number of top tier decks run two copies of both shadowflame and hellfire, and some run 2 copies of Savage Roar. For reach at least, I would consider Pyroclasm as the ultimate example as a card you don't want to run more than one of, and for the split aspect of things, would simply recommend a better example, can't think of one off hand though.
    – Waterseas
    Commented Feb 9, 2015 at 20:21
  • @Waterseas I didn't mention Pyroclasm because it fits in multiple categories and therefore wouldn't distinctly represent a category--but it is a great example! Savage Roar, I feel is my worst example simply because two copies are often used, though not always. A better example would be appreciated. I stand behind my Shadowflame and Hellfire example even though Handlock tends to run all four, other Warlock decks do not. Perhaps Swipe and Starfall is a better example, but I looked through recent top tournament decks and never saw a Starfall.
    – ken.ganong
    Commented Feb 9, 2015 at 20:39

Sometimes you have to run only one card because of the limited numbers of card in a deck. This is mostly due to how much this card synergizes with the rest of the deck.

For example if you want to make a Shaman deck with mana tide totem i suggest you only take one, because you don't want to waste any more slots, better take a card that has more board influence.

Another example is Holy Fire, it is a good card to make damage and heal yourself, but it is high cost and has no board influence, its basically an expensive execute / heal. Many times you will have it in your hand but you won't use it because you have power words or Big game hunter and so on.

That means it is a strong, but very situational card which will prove itself useless in some situation and useful in others.

So in summary, I recommend to only use one when:

  • The card is very situational
  • It's effect is not always gonna work ( see mind control tech for example, very unlikely to be used twice in the same game )
  • You already have similar card and don't want too many of that type ( see starfall for example, 2 swipes and a starfall is usually more than enough to clear board as druid )

I will eventually update my answer it anything else comes to my mind while playing

  • But if the card is situational then probability for it to be useful small, and when you put only one in your deck then probability that it will be used even smaller, why bother and why waste the slot?... So the OP's question stays unanswered - if you don't like to "waste" 2nd slot for this card why do you even "waste" the 1st slot?
    – klm123
    Commented Feb 9, 2015 at 7:45
  • Ok lets take mind control tech as an example. Say you have one in your deck, it could eventually win you the game if you manage to steal something big from your opponent. But since it is a card you want to keep in your hand in case your hopponent is gonna play 4 minions, there is no point in having.
    – Jubatus
    Commented Feb 9, 2015 at 8:09
  • 1
    Another example could be doomguard, some people remove 1 doomguard and only leave on, because they interfere with themself ( if you have both in hand you will be able to play only one )
    – Jubatus
    Commented Feb 9, 2015 at 8:10
  • Also, this is something you will leanr/notice while playing decks. At some point you will look at your hand and say "I don't need 2 of those, one is enough" and replace it with something else.
    – Jubatus
    Commented Feb 9, 2015 at 8:26
  • The Priest card "Mind Control" is another example. Anytime you have one in your hand before turn 10 you can't play it. If you have two in your deck, it is more likely to occur and having 2 mindcontrols in your starting hand will lose you the game by itself.
    – Yalla T.
    Commented Feb 9, 2015 at 14:43

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .