In this image, to the right there is a triangle of 3 portals with all sides linked, but there is no field created:


How did this happen? I checked that none of the portals are actually two portals very close together.


It is called null field. It wont disappear.

I am on mobile now, hard to type, later I will edit it.

Here is the explanation:


|improve this answer|||||
  • Cool . That graphic fits with my hypothesis from above... thanks for the response and I look forward to the tidied up post :) – M.M Jul 17 '16 at 9:29

That's a server synchronization problem. It should resolve itself within a day or so. (However, because this is not actually an inconsistent state, it might not.)

Unfortunately, if it's your non-field, you won't get the AP retroactively.

The reason this is not inconsistent: imagine a portal within that triangle. The rule is that the smallest-possible triangle on each side of a link gets the field, thus the link which closed it could have created a field between its endpoints and that inner portal. Now imagine that this inner portal gets deleted or moved for some reason.

|improve this answer|||||
  • OK. I had another hypothesis too: maybe the blue portal at the left used to be green and connected to the two right-most portals, before the right-most link was put in. Then adding that link would only fill in the larger field; and then the blue portal was captured by blue destroying that field. – M.M Jul 16 '16 at 1:11
  • 1
    No, ingress doesn't work that way. When a portal changes colors it loses all its links. – Matthias Urlichs Jul 16 '16 at 5:41
  • No, the rule is that the largest possible triangle on each side gets the link. And it is linkely not a synchro problem. – ch7kor Jul 18 '16 at 9:10

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.