5

I recently hatched a Magby, which is #240 in the Pokedex. As of February 2017 the highest other Pokemon I have seen are in the 170s though. Are there a lot of Pokemon from this part of the Pokedex not yet included in Pokemon Go?

Update:

The missing Pokemon appear to be there now.

Improve this question
3
  • @DanmakuGrazer Could that question be out of date? Last it was answered was December 2016, and we're on to February now. I don't keep up with PoGo anymore so I'm not sure whether a close vote is appropriate at this time.
    – nightsurfer
    Feb 14, 2017 at 13:51
  • 1
    @Kaizerwolf There is no evidence of it being out of date. If this question included something among the lines of "I've seen this question before, but I've encountered a Pokémon not included in that list", then t would be.
    – Wrigglenite
    Feb 14, 2017 at 13:53
  • 2
    Your edit does not make the other question outdated.
    – Wrigglenite
    Feb 14, 2017 at 14:13

1 Answer 1

Reset to default
22

Prior to the second generation update

Nearly all the Pokémon from the second generation are not included yet in the game. The only second generation Pokémon present at the moment are the following:

  • Pichu (#172)
  • Cleffa (#173)
  • Igglybuff (#174)
  • Togepi (#175)
  • Togetic (#176)
  • Smoochum (#238)
  • Elekid (#239)
  • Magby (#240)

Magby being #240, it's the highest you can reach right now in the Pokédex. The highest you could reach before was Dragonite which is #149. So everything above #149 is missing in the game at the moment, except for the ones from the list above.

Since second generation update

It has now been possible to catch pretty much all the Pokémon of the second generation up to Ho-Oh, which is #250. Celebi is still missing.

Improve this answer
5
  • I'm not sure why you're updating this answer and leaving the original question alone.
    – Wrigglenite
    Dec 13, 2017 at 17:18
  • @DanmakuGrazer Sounded to me I had to go through my old answers to keep them up to date, as I have been asked to recently by another user. I guess I will just rollback it if that's a problem.
    – Izuka
    Dec 13, 2017 at 17:20
  • There's no point in keeping a duplicate up to date.
    – Wrigglenite
    Dec 13, 2017 at 17:24
  • @DanmakuGrazer Answer has been rollbacked.
    – Izuka
    Dec 13, 2017 at 17:24
  • I mean that instead of updating the duplicate, it's better to update the original.
    – Wrigglenite
    Dec 13, 2017 at 17:28

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .