When you hunt in Red Dead Redemption 2, you can choose to carry the shot animal or to skin it. When you skin it, you get meat and a pelt whereas just carrying the carcass simply leaves you with ... a carcass. So what are the advantages and disadvantages of skinning an animal in RDR2?


I've played enough to complete the story and side missions. Personally, I always skin them if I want the items. Here are the differences as I understand it:

Skinning carcasses

  • You can store more skins on your horse than carcasses. When you stow a carcass you have one 'large' slot on the back of your horse and one 'medium' slot on either side of the horse, whereas multiple skins can be stacked up on the back of the horse (the exception being very large pelts which must be stowed in the large space).
  • You store some of the meat and the other items (horns, feathers, etc) in your satchel right away.
  • Some animals are too large to stow, and have to be skinned to get their parts.

Unskinned carcasses

  • Unskinned carcasses give more meat overall when sold or donated to camp (If you skin bigger animals you usually get a message saying you couldn't carry everything).
  • They are worth more money when sold, compared to the value of the pelt/meats when skinned.
  • Not skinning them means you can avoid sitting through the skinning animation (approximately 3-10 seconds depending on the size of the animal)

Here is a pretty good article with more details

|improve this answer|||||

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.