1

I've played Civ5 quite a lot, and I was wondering if there's a time where it's worth it to use a Great Person for tile improvements on Iron or Salt (for example) ?

Usually I use Great Scientist for Academy, and put it on plains/desert/toundra. For Toundra/desert, I find it very worth it, and once in a while I discover Oil or something under it. I've got to use the ressource, but I never know if it's a waste, or not.

3

The reason great person improvements collect strategic resources is because those resources are hidden until the correct tech is researched. Putting an Academy on a tile then being forced to demolish it after discovering it's the only source of oil in the region would be immensely frustrating.

As for whether it's worth it, it's not ideal. Usually you're better off building the improvement somewhere else and the appropriate improvement on the resource- especially for later game strategic resources.

The exception to this is if you urgently need the resource. The great person will make it available instantly while a worker will take several turns.

Note that this only works with strategic resources and does not work with luxuries. Building a great improvement on a luxury resource is just a waste of a luxury.

  • Do you know if it counts for buildings that asks for a specific ressource's improvement? – LamaDelRay Dec 12 '18 at 17:07
  • 1
    Also, building a Great Person improvement instantly clears forest/jungle, and the associated production bonus can be useful, particularly if you're building a Wonder. – user3490 Dec 25 '18 at 10:58
0

Great People's tiles DO link any resources to your network, so you're not missing out on anything.

Whether or not its a good idea to do so at any given moment depends on a LOT of factors. But putting them down on strategic resources is generally a good idea IMO. Great People's improvements are generally better than a regular improvement (depending on what you need of course).

  • The tradeoff might not be "Put an academy on the coal" vs. "Put a mine on the coal" but something more like "Put an academy on the coal, and a mine on this adjacent hill" vs. "Put a mine on the coal, and an academy on the adjacent hill". In this case, the second option produces strictly more resources. – Misha Lavrov Dec 12 '18 at 19:33

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.