Super Smash Bros. Ultimate introduces the concept of Echo Fighters, or characters that are near clones with minor differences.

While in some cases, like with Roy and Chrom, the differences are very clear, in others it's not readily apparent what's changed. Peach and Daisy for example have been acknowledged to be carbon copies and been treated as interchangeable in competitive play since the game was released.

What if any are the gameplay (non-aesthetic) differences between the two princesses?

2 Answers 2


There are very small differences between Peach and Daisy in their hurtboxes: Daisy:

  • In her idle animation has a slightly smaller hurtbox vertically. Aesthetically, this is because she doesn't keep her back as straight as Peach
  • In her idle animation, running animation, and reversing her running animation, she has a slightly larger hurtbox horizontally. Aesthetically, this is because she keeps her arms held up by her sides

These differences are extremely slight to the point that people consider them identical.


As of Update 3.0.0...

Turnips are no longer different between the two. From the patch notes on Daisy's down-special:

The launch distance when hitting an opponent with a vegetable now matches Peach.

Many people thought that the fact that they were different to begin with was a development mistake. Daisy's knockback values (pre-3.0.0) were the numbers Peach had in Smash 4. So the fact that they're now changed to match each other seems to confirm that someone was copy-pasting values and forgot to change both Peach and Daisy.

I'll leave the below answer for historic value, but note that it's no longer accurate as of Update 3.0.0.

Their Turnips

Peach and Daisy's down-special, Vegetable was just yesterday discovered to have different knockback values between the two characters!

@jugeeya on Twitter was able to pull the code that shows this:

Peach/Daisy Turnip KB Vals

As you can see, everything is the same except the Knockback Scaling (KBG) and Base Knockback (BKB) between the two (45/25 for Peach, 35/30 for Daisy).

How does the game use these numbers?

For that we're going to have to take a look at how Knockback works in Smash. To take from that Wiki page, the formula used to calculate how far a character will fly from any given move looks like1:

Knockback Formula

To paraphrase from the Wiki page, these variables are:

  • p - Percent of the player being hit (after the attack's damage is added)
  • d - Damage the attack dealt
  • w - Weight of the player being hit
  • s - Knockback Scaling, or KBG in the code above
  • b - Base Knockback, or BKB in the code above
  • r - A collection of any other modifiers (from things like giant mushroom, smash attack charge, rage, etc...)

So since Peach has less Base Knockback but more Knockback Scaling than Daisy, it means that at lower percents Peach's turnips won't send the opponent as far, but at higher percents, they'll begin to send linearly further.

Okay, but what does that actually look like?

To visualize this, @Ruben on Twitter posted some graphs of what knockback will look like at different percents for different Turnips (remember that knockback is calculated with the percent of the opponent after the damage is dealt. So even if the opponents starts at 0%, with a turnip like the Stichface that deals 30% Daisy may never actually have more knockback):

Normal Turnip Knockback Winking Turnip Knockback Dot Eyes Turnip Knockback Stitchface Turnip Knockback

What does this mean for the characters at a competitive level?

As is made clear by the above graphs, the window where Daisy will deal more knockback is extremely tiny and even non-existent with some Turnips. Peach just consistently hits harder, especially at later percents when looking for a kill.

The lesser knockback may give Daisy some more interesting or consistent combos, but at the moment it hasn't been tested enough to be shown.

The immediate reaction from most of the community and the large Peach/Daisy players is that Peach is now clearly the better character. But only time will tell. In the near future at least, I wouldn't expect to see any Daisy's at high levels of play.

1. In plain text, this is:

(((((p/10 + p*d/20) * 200/(w + 100) * 1.4) + 18) * s) + b) * r
  • 3
    I knew some difference would turnip!....... I should probably show myself to the door after that one :) Are the "hitboxes" of the daisies/peaches in their final smashes at all different? The are slightly different shapes.
    – Brandon_J
    Mar 18, 2019 at 17:24
  • @Brandon_J heh. Well played. I'm not sure on the final smashes, but I'm pretty sure there are minor differences in their hurtboxes. If no one else does, I may make another answer with some of the smaller differences. This one is what will separate the two in competitive play though.
    – scohe001
    Mar 18, 2019 at 17:38
  • I disagree with your assertion that more knockback is always better. A lot of times competitive players are looking for consistent setups for combos, not necessarily more kill moves. The more even distribution of KB for Daisy means that there is a wider range of damage that they will set up into a combo which may be preferred for some players. Mar 18, 2019 at 20:08
  • @ChaseSandmann you may be right that in the long-run it'll turn out that Daisy will be able to pull off more interesting combos because of this. But for the time being, the immediate reaction from the big Peach/Daisy players is that Peach is now clearly better. Only time will tell. I'll edit that last section to be a little less definitive though.
    – scohe001
    Mar 18, 2019 at 20:18
  • 1
    This ((((( in the formula annoyed me, so I refactored it: 28prs/(w+100)+14dprs/(w+100)+18rs+br It's up to the reader to decide if that's easier to understand. Apr 23, 2019 at 11:51

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .