I consider myself to have decent knowledge of networking fundamentals, but I have no clue what the role of chipsets in LAN Adapters is. I can see that they probably run a small process that converts USB Signals to Ethernet Signals, but I don't understand how some chipsets are compatible with a certain hardware and others aren't - shouldn't the data, as soon as it leaves the device, be the same? Why can the Switch support only one chipset? And is it intentional, or is it a lot of work to add "support" for more chipsets?


1 Answer 1


The data is indeed the same, but it's packaged in a different way.

The adapters do not simply convert USB signals to Ethernet signals, and the computer cannot simply start sending Ethernet frames over the USB connection. Instead, it still has to act like a regular USB host – the OS will identify the adapter as a USB device, enumerate interfaces and endpoints it offers, then send each Ethernet frame using a USB transfer. The adapter's chip receives the USB transfer, extracts the data, then re-sends the data over Ethernet.

However, there are several different standards describing how a USB device could provide Ethernet emulation. Newer ones such as RNDIS were created to provide more capabilities that older ones such as ECM couldn't satisfy.

And on top of that, some manufacturers have decided to invent their own customized protocols instead – ASIX with its AX88179 chipset line is indeed one of them, using neither RNDIS nor ECM nor any other standard. (This does allow them to provide more control over the Ethernet adapter's behavior – ethtool on Linux shows a great deal more information about the connection status than it does with other adapters.)

The computer's OS needs to have a driver for each method it wants to support, because it has to know which endpoints are to be used, how the transfers must be formatted, etc. Some operating systems only come with ECM drivers. Others support RNDIS as well (Android tethering uses it, and you used to need drivers in WinXP). And Nintendo Switch apparently has only drivers for ASIX AX88179.

  • I do try to answer off-topic questions less, but I think that 95% of the question isn't off-topic to begin with. And if pseudo-answering it in a comment is okay then so is answering it properly.
    – user1686
    Mar 19, 2020 at 18:56
  • Thanks, i also dont see how this is in any way off-topic, as it isnt limited to the switch, thats just an example of a device not supporting all USB-Ethernet Adapters- i thought it could be the usual "everyone makes their own standard" thing, i just didnt understand why Nintendo would only add one driver. I guess because they have their own Adapter and want people to buy it.
    – Flying Thunder
    Mar 20, 2020 at 19:34
  • But there already are plenty other AX88179-based adapters, e.g. I have one branded "Plugable" and another branded "Edimax" (100 Mbps series and 1 Gbps series use two different drivers, by the way). So if they actually wanted lock-in they would only accept adapters with their own Vendor ID – they wouldn't accept just any adapter with same chipset.
    – user1686
    Mar 20, 2020 at 19:38

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .