I always play as the Eden Initiative. Am I missing out on anything by not playing Global Trust?

  • Go with the tycoons for quick cash, and when you reach 1 executive, unlock the Eden for your farms. Thats what I did.
    – user48052
    May 5 '13 at 13:53

The Global Trust tends to use much more efficient buildings for resource acquisition and powering structures, but at a cost of having a detrimental effect to the environment.

The most obvious one players will notice is the ability to mine iron and coal far more efficiently than the Eden Initiative. Their buildings tend to take up more space however, and generate a significantly worse impact on the ecosystem.

As your cities level up, you'll find that not only can Global Trust generate much more in resources, they also tend to generate a lot more funds than the Eden Initiative (they have Casinos).

You should decide carefully which pros and cons you feel better suited to playing with when deciding which faction to choose.

Eco-friendly, but weak in resources? Or industrious, but polluting?

Either way you play it, both sides have their pros and cons to balance each other out. They can be equally as difficult to work with.

  • One can put blueprints for the dam or the big eco-devices tl clunteract the bad effects of being a tycoon. I never had a bad eco system or energy needs for the first few citizen levels
    – BlueWizard
    Jun 7 '17 at 22:46

The short answer is 'not really'. The fundamental mechanics are the same, and I'd say the complexity of each faction's supply chain is about equal. Playing either faction feels about the same, aside from a few small differences which IMO the game doesn't really do enough to emphasize... aside from making Tycoon islands look very brown.

A number of Tycoon and Eco techs compliment each other, so you're limiting yourself if you avoid Tycoons altogether (particularly on continuous+large games). Tycoon resource extraction tends to be more compact, so you can squeeze more out of your land early on, but at the cost of more eco damage. Tycoons also generate more cash, but this is offset by the fact that eco farms can be made a lot more productive because the Eco tech can push an island's eco score very high, allowing farms to overproduce.

Playing a different faction probably won't rekindle your interest in the game if its fading, but I'd definitely recommended mixing it up if you're still looking forward to spending a lot of time with it.


well tycoons are bad polluters only until you unlock engineers, then you've the deacidification station which pops in up to +90 eco and takes 60 energy (= 1 coal power plant) and are really small so you can squeeze them in those tiny spots you wouldn't use anyways (also they don't need to be connected)

tycons > eden (provided you can sustain deacidification stations)


Well... I play only as an Eco. Eco does not mine any resource directly, but trade for them. Advance your city before you do that, though. The general idea is to use the other players' technology, produce their products and undersell them. When you feel that you're overproducing something, you can start building other faction's buildings and houses.

When I play Eco I use only one island for populating. Everything else is for farming and production. This gets you more space for houses.

  • Eco DO mine resources, and I don't think it matters how you settle islands, as that has nothing to do with the question.
    – user1337
    Feb 25 '14 at 18:16

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.