111
reputation
3

probabilityislogic

Statistics tragic, most definitely an objective Bayesian style statistician. I find myself quite compelled by the "probability as extended logic" philosophy, particularly the work of Edwin Jaynes. I have also derived on of the most important rules ever: BAYESIAN+JAYNES=JAYNESIAN. lol. But seriously, I am in awe of this guy: he is like the "Jesus" of statistical thinking.

I also quite dislike the use of the word "prior beliefs" which gets attach to prior probabilities in the Bayesian world. It brings over the wrong connotations - I think "prior assumptions" or "prior state of knowledge" better describes what is actually encapsulated by "the prior" of Bayesian statistics.

Which is worse: a frequentist who refuses to use prior's (but is happy to assume a likelihood) or a subjective Bayesian who claims that they can be whatever you "believe"?

1
answer
0
questions
~3k
people reached
  • Australia
  • Member for 1 year, 9 months
  • 6 profile views
  • Last seen Jun 19 '19 at 3:19

Top tags (1)

Score 1
Posts 1
Posts % 100

Top posts (1) All Questions Answers | Votes Newest

Badges (3)

Gold

Silver

Bronze

3

Rarest