3

I always seem to get stuck here. I'll have a TON of residential areas, like, literally the entire map full. But the "low" residential demand just keeps going super high. And I literally just do not have the space to put any more down.

I've heard the ratio 3:1:1 for R:I:C as far as the "golden ratio". Is this still true? Also, am I possibly upgrading my residential communities too fast? (AKA by placing parks and such).

I get constant complaints about jobs. But I think I'm maybe trying to progress too fast. Is it ideal to sort of move "all" resedential areas up "value"-wise, or sort of keep sections segregated (AKA have high/low/medium residential areas, but keep them segregated).

For reference, I'm going with an electronics specialization.

Improve this question

1 Answer 1

Reset to default
3

For background, reference these questions:

How can I increase the density of residential zones?

How do you provide more workers to your city?

Ok, now that the basics are covered, let's talk about purpose of R, C, and I. in a town with a manufacturing specialization.

R is the source of your residential agents. If you are focusing on a specialization, your main interest in R is that it brings in workers. Place parks to set the land value of an area and force a given wealth level to settle there. All R wealth levels start at low density and expand as happiness accrues. You will need areas that are not near parks for low wealth to settle into and expand into LW HD R buildings. You want to keep your jobs full, so add (or density up) more R until that happens. Workers of a given wealth level will only work at jobs with a matching wealth level (most buildings have jobs for each wealth level).

You will want at least the LW and MW residential buildings, as they supply the most workers per building. If you are having tax trouble and have space to work with, then add HW residentials.

C is primarily a source of R happiness, which will cause R to increase in density. Usually you'll want to satisfy at least half of your shoppers. Shoppers of a given wealth level will only shop at C buildings of the matching wealth level. C also provides jobs and taxes. You may want to keep C at medium density for tax and traffic purposes. C mainly increases in density by selling its goods. If you overbuild C, you'll have extra jobs pulling workers away from your specialization and extra unsold goods which will cause C to abandon.

If you need to increase R happiness and really can't spare the workers for C, use parks (with expansions). The "Medium Field with Parking" is ideal low wealth R in size, capacity and cost. It does not increase land value, so you can place it near your LW R without worry.

I is primarily a source of jobs without an increase in goods. Since you have a specialization, it's entirely possible you don't have spare workers for I to soak up and therefore do not need any I buildings.

Improve this answer
2
  • Is there a "good" ratio for each like 1:1 for Resedential L:M wealth. and 2:1:1 for overall R:C:I?
    – user7193
    Commented Aug 31, 2013 at 14:47
  • 1
    Too many connections to use building by building ratios. For example, one HW HD C building has enough goods to serve more than 10 HW HD R buildings. Use your population details screen instead and add what you need. If you want to plan, use these jobs and workers per building data: gaming.stackexchange.com/questions/108399/…
    – Amy B
    Commented Aug 31, 2013 at 14:54

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.