I know that if I make a redstone circuit that switches too often, my redstone torches will 'burn out' and stop working. Under what circumstances does this happen? Will a slow circuit eventually burn out? If not, what's the maximum 'clock speed' for a circuit such that it will never burn out?


The fastest clock that will not burn out is the 4-clock. A common design is this one:

- =wire
r =repeater

- r -
r   r
- r -

I think all repeaters must be set to 4 to remain stable, but I've been fine setting them to 3 before.

Edit: I did some research, to investigate. I have found that a torch needs at least 8 ticks total delay between pulses to prevent burnout. So the repeater clock with 4 repeaters should be set to at least 2 ticks each.

My basic setup: My experiment setup

Basically, my experiment involved that basic repeater clock hooked up to 4 torches. I started with them each at 1 tick delay, and, as expected, all of the torches burnt out very quickly. I increased the delay on the repeaters one by one until the torches stopped burning out. This point came when each repeater was at 2 ticks delay (though the torches were probably pulsing too quickly for most devices).

Though it should be noted that torches can be extremely buggy sometimes; sometimes, pulling a lever will burn a torch out...

  • But wouldn't a piston clock going faster than the 4-clock cause other circuitry to burn out? – fredley Feb 27 '12 at 13:42
  • That is true. If you have it hooked up to other torches, then 4 is the number to shoot for (though a lot of times, I try to adapt my circuitry so I don't have to deal with it) – Unionhawk Feb 27 '12 at 13:47
  • Can you elaborate on the research you did? This is shaping up to be a great answer, but it needs to be perfect before I'll accept it :-P – fredley Feb 29 '12 at 14:21

A redstone torch will simply "blow out" when its state is being changed too quickly (i.e. a very fast clock).

  • 2
    I know this, but exactly how quickly is too quickly? – fredley Feb 28 '12 at 10:18
  • 3
    The question asker probably already knows this, considering that is in the first sentence of his question and all. – Steve V. Feb 29 '12 at 5:51
  • I'm sorry, I did not pay enough attention to the question. – Daniel Bezden Mar 2 '12 at 22:20
  • 2
    Maybe you should delete this answer. – kotekzot May 27 '12 at 15:07

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.